Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For “Green World Order” By 2012

Massive $45 trillion transfer of wealth to fund creation of “global governance structure”

Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For Green World Order By 2012 260210top

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Friday, February 26, 2010

Leaked policy documents reveal that the United Nations plans to create a “green world order” by 2012 which will be enforced by a structure of global governance and funded by a gargantuan $45 trillion transfer of wealth from richer countries, as the globalists’ insidious plan to centralize power, crush sovereignty while devastating the economy is exposed once again.

As we warned at the time, the failure of Copenhagen in December did not spell the end of the global warming heist, but merely a roadblock in the UN’s agenda to create a world government funded by taxes paid by you on the very substance you exhale – carbon dioxide.

Using the justification of the vehemently debunked hoax that carbon dioxide is a deadly threat to the planet, the UN is already working to resurrect the failed Copenhagen agreement, with a series of new Copenhagen process negotiations set to take place in April, May and June.

Leaked planning documents (PDF) obtained by Fox News lift the lid on the UN’s plan to impose global governance by the time of their 2012 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio, which will mark the 20th anniversary since the notorious “Earth Summit” held in the same city.

“The new Rio summit will end, according to U.N. documents obtained by Fox News, with a “focused political document” presumably laying out the framework and international commitments to a new Green World Order,” reports Fox News’ George Russell.

“Just exactly what that environmental order will look like, and the extent of the immense financial commitments needed to produce it, are under discussion this week at a special session in Bali, Indonesia, of the United Nations Environment Program’s 58-nation “Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environmental Forum,” which oversees UNEP’s operations.”

The document outlines the globalist’s mission to enact a “radical transformation of the world economic and social order” by putting “a new treaty in place as the capstone of the Green World Order”.

This system will be managed by “an additional governing structure composed of exactly those insiders,” writes Russell.

“Moving towards a green economy would also provide an opportunity to re-examine national and global governance structures and consider whether such structures allow the international community to respond to current and future environmental and development challenges and to capitalize on emerging opportunities,” states the white paper (emphasis mine).


Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For Green World Order By 2012 190110banner4

The imposition of such “global governance structures” will be achieved with the help of “vast wealth transfers” from richer countries (in the form of carbon taxes levied on citizens) to poorer nations, amounting to no less than $45 trillion dollars. The paper also outlines the need to change the “consumption patterns” of people living in richer countries, which undoubtedly is a euphemism for lowering living standards.

The policy proposes that the old economic model be discarded in pursuit of a new global green economy focused around “green jobs”.

As we have previously highlighted, the promise that the creation of “green jobs” will offset the inevitable damage to the economy that a 50 per cent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions will cause is a complete fallacy.

The implementation of so-called “green jobs” in other countries has devastated economies and cost millions of jobs. As the Seattle Times reported back in June, Spain’s staggering unemployment rate of over 18 per cent was partly down to massive job losses as a result of attempts to replace existing industry with wind farms and other forms of alternative energy.

In a so-called “green economy,” “Each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries because of the political allocation — sub-optimum in terms of economic efficiency — of capital,” states the report.

As we have documented, a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions of 50-80 per cent would inflict a new great depression in the United States, reducing GDP by 6.9 percent – a figure comparable with the economic meltdown of 1929 and 1930.

The UN’s mission to create a legally binding treaty on the reduction of CO2 emissions is running parallel with measures already being enforced at state level in the U.S. which bypass stuttering federal efforts to impose the cap and trade fraud.

The very foundation of the global warming argument has been completely eviscerated by the Climategate scandal, which proved that United Nations IPCC scientists forged and exaggerated data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures while engaging in witch hunts to cull dissenting opinions from appearing in IPPC reports.

Despite this, control freaks intent on taxing the life-giving gas carbon dioxide have signaled that they no longer care about the truth behind man-made climate change and have resolved to slam through their totalitarian agenda anyway. EPA head Lisa Jackson told reporters this week that “The science regarding climate change is settled, and human activity is responsible for global warming,” even though she failed to refute the fact that there had been no global warming since 1995, as was admitted by CRU scientist Professor Phil Jones.

Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online – Don’t Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!


CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are “they” suppressing the cure? Will YOU be the next victim? Learn the Secret Truth! – READ FULL STORY


About Clare Swinney

Interested in what is really going on, not that promoted as "truth" by the corrupt mainstream media.
This entry was posted in Global Warming Hoax, New World Order. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Leaked UN Documents Reveal Plan For “Green World Order” By 2012

  1. Anon says:

    I’m actually all for the redistribution of wealth and the “lowering” of living standards.

    I put “lowering” in quotation marks because if it simply means that we stop being so consumption minded, then i’m all for it.

    I am absolutely sick of watching tv shows where a person is buying a new house and claims that it is too small. Or they see brand new white appliances and say “oh those HAVE to be stainless”.

    That’s where we are at and that is why the wealth distribution is a good thing. Stop people from being so greedy.

    Likely however, the people who run this website will give some speech how it’s people’s “right” to buy whatever they want in the name of freedom and yada yada yada. Well actually not. You don’t get special rights because you are part of the lucky sperm club and was given the fortune of being born in the U.S.

    We are responsible for the well being of all…even if it means we have to opt for a V6 instead of a V8, or white appliances instead of stainless steel.

    Wake up…the 20th century is over and so is the “way” we once knew it was. As much as you think i’m against you…i’m not. I wish it was the same as before too…

    …unfortunately that lifestyle is not realistic long term.

    I’m losing my faith in capitalism.

  2. Nik says:

    If to be judged at all, those who advocate that the cause of environmentalism is superior or of an equal priority to the prosperity and general evening up of conditions for mankind, it might serve best to judge them with pity.

    For it is only mankind that the living god has endowed & elevated with free-will, and any movement or shift of emphasis that seeks to take away from this greatest of gifts is to be defying one’s own living god. Mankind cannot be godless, we alone only have the birthright to defy our living god but as the passage of time shows, it is only in the living god that life is everlasting.

    As to the praticalities of having a good environment, any parent will be able to tell that authentically happy children do help look after the house without much prodding required in their natural devlopment.

    So it is with society, and as has been the case for a very long time now, a simple case of changing an accounting definition in the accounting of the annual money system would be the foundational parenting for the free development of society, thus solving the secondary enviornmental hurdles along the way.

  3. Nik says:

    – “I am absolutely sick of watching tv shows where a person is buying a new house and claims that it is too small. Or they see brand new white appliances and say “oh those HAVE to be stainless”. –

    Anon, don’t watch those t.v. shows. Or don’t watch t.v. at all maybe better.

    There is nothing wrong with people enjoying their wealth or wealth in general, who is anyone to say how that is done because where they are at is greater than the neighbour.

    It is privilege gained at the expense of others that is not good in any sense, and which is not neccessary in the natural world that we co-habit. We have a different heritage than that of the more than primitive primates.

    People can have mansions & sports cars etc if they need to and other people can live non-materialistic lives. All have a natural place of shared prosperity and pursuit of happiness in a un-political society with calibrated money systems of choice, if necessary, providing the fundamental distributed necessities of shelter, well being and freedom to all the different motivations.

    This just requires the agreement & understanding of laws of honest accounting being enforceable for those who desire them in their chosen means of exchange systems and people being free to participate in them through such laws being upheld. Nothing more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s