Lord Christopher Monckton Releases The Definitive Report On ClimateGate

Lord Monckton

Treaty expert and former adviser to Margaret Thatcher, Lord Christopher Monckton, has written a 42-page report on ClimateGate, which examines the contents of the leaked e-mails and how the climate criminals fudged the data, plus more.

Writes Monckton in the report’s introduction:  “The whistleblower deep in the basement of one of the ugly, modern tower-blocks of the dismal, windswept University of East Anglia could scarcely have timed it better.
In less than three weeks, the world’s governing class – its classe politique – would meet in Copenhagen, Denmark, to discuss a treaty to inflict an unelected and tyrannical global government on us, with vast and unprecedented powers to control all once-free world markets and to tax and regulate the world’s wealthier nations for its own enrichment: in short, to bring freedom, democracy, and prosperity to an instant end worldwide, at the stroke of a pen, on the pretext of addressing what is now known to be the non-problem of manmade “global warming”.

To read the report, go here.

Related:

To read the UN Climate Change Treaty go here. In particular, read Article 38 on page 18.

Climategate Master Criminal Phil Jones Collected $22.6 Million in Grants

Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest Al Gore + Climategate Talk On the Alex Jones Show

Flashback: Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

This entry was posted in Activism, Global Warming Hoax and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Lord Christopher Monckton Releases The Definitive Report On ClimateGate

  1. hkyson says:

    “Climategate” started out when there appeared on the Internet a collection of e-mails of a group of climatologists who work in the University of East Anglia in England. These documents reveal that some climatologists of international preeminence have manipulated the data of their investigations and have strongly tried to discredit climatologists who are not convinced that the increasing quantities of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere are the cause of global warming.

    It is true that a majority of the scientists who study climatic tendencies in our atmosphere have arrived at the conclusion that the world’s climate is changing, and they have convinced a group of politicians, some of whom are politically powerful, of the truth of their conclusions.

    A minority, however, is skeptical. Some believe that recent data that suggest that the average temperature of the atmosphere is going up can be explained by natural variations in solar radiation and that global warming is a temporary phenomenon. Others believe that the historical evidence indicating that the temperature of the atmosphere is going up at a dangerous rate is simply not reliable.

    Such lacks of agreement are common in the sciences. They are reduced and eventually eliminated with the accumulation of new evidence and of more refined theories or even by completely new ones. Such debates can persist for a period of decades. Academics often throw invective at one another in these debates. But typically this does not mean much.

    But the case of climate change is different. If the evidence indicates that global warming is progressive, is caused principally by our industrial processes, and will probably cause disastrous changes in our atmosphere before the end of the twenty-first century, then we do not have the time to verify precisely if this evidence is reliable. Such a process would be a question of many years of new investigations. And if the alarmist climatologists are right, such a delay would be tragic for all humanity.

    The difficulty is that economic and climatologic systems are very complicated. They are not like celestial mechanics, which involves only the interaction of gravity and centrifugal force, and efforts to construct computerized models to describe these complicated systems simply cannot include all the factors that are influential in the evolution of these complicated systems.

    All this does not necessarily indicate that the alarmist climatologists are not right. But it really means that if global warming is occurring, we cannot know exactly what will be the average temperature of our atmosphere in the year 2100 and what will be the average sea level of the world’s ocean in that year.

    It also means that we cannot be confident that efforts by the industrialized countries to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere will have a significant influence on the evolution of the world’s climate.

    Alas, the reduction of carbon dioxide in our atmosphere would be very costly and would greatly change the lives of all the inhabitants of our planet–with the possibility (perhaps even the probability!) that all these efforts will be completely useless.

    Harleigh Kyson Jr.

    • Clare Swinney says:

      It has been cooling since 1998. The climate criminals at East Anglia, who were providing the IPCC with data, and paid a fortune for doing so, were HIDING THE DECLINE in global temperatures. They have destroyed the raw data. Why?
      Also, it was not just those at that University who were involved. The e-mail implicate others, and as Lord Monckton advised in a recent interview, people have been contacting him to make formal complaints to the police who are outside East Anglia.
      I suggest you listen to this 2 hour interview with Dr Tim Ball, a retired climatologist who looked at the e-mails and understood their significance, to get a grasp of the magnitude of the climate crime:
      http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2009/12dec/RIR-091201.php

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s