The Deception of Fluoridation

This was written by Hesh Goldstein. Goldstein has a Master’s degree in Nutrition and has been a moderator of a weekly radio show in Honolulu, Hawaii  called “Health Talk” since 1981.

(NaturalNews) The following article is, in essence, my testimony delivered to the Hawaii Senate Health Committee in 2008. It contains facts that anyone can use to oppose water fluoridation wherever you live. The good news is that once again we have been successful in keeping fluoride out of our water supply.

Here we go again. Let’s take our pure and tasty drinking water, put a medication (fluoride) in it, make the people accept it and make believe we have Freedom of Choice in this country.

I would like to pose some hypothetical questions:

What would you do if you suddenly found out that fluoride was not “safe and effective” at all, but was actually a carcinogenic industrial waste?

What would you do if you learned that the sugar lobby’s answer to cavity reduction is more fluoride rather than less sugar in the diet?

What would you think if you suddenly found out that fluoride doesn’t stop tooth decay at all, but actually causes teeth to rot and crumble, and by the same mechanism also causes osteoporosis?

What would you do if you found out that a myriad of research and reports from China, showing that fluoride ingestion causes interference with brain development, had been purposely withheld from the people in the U.S.?

What would you do if you suddenly found out that fluoride inhibits antibody formation in the blood, depresses thyroid activity, promotes the development of bone cancer, causes premature aging of the human body, and is used in rat poison, and that the contents of a family size tube of overpriced, huge profit margined fluoridated toothpaste is enough to kill a 25 pound child?

And after you found out all this, would it surprise you that federal health agencies have known these facts for years, but have been controlled by the political interests of the nuclear arms, aluminum, and phosphate manufacturers to keep it a secret?

Why would they do that? So that a toxic industrial waste could be passed off on the public as a nutrient with necessary health benefits, to the tune of $10 billion a year or more going in the pockets of these industries rather then they having to spend that amount to dispose of it properly as a toxic waste.

Next, we have to look at the people that are for and against this assault upon our health.

Those against this horror movie are everyday people. Accountants, retired engineers, chemistry professors, teachers, acupuncturists, dentists, believe it or not, the Union of Scientists at the EPA, and a host of others from all walks of life. And, all of them come armed with peer-reviewed scientific literature to back up what they have to say.

Those in favor of this horror movie, with lots of credentials, are the majority of dentists, the public health officials and many people in various government positions. And what do they come armed with? Speculation and years of repeating, like good little lemmings, that fluoride is “safe and effective”. If it were so safe and effective to ingest, why would the CDC say that fluoride’s effectiveness is on the surface of the tooth and only after it comes into the mouth?

Anyway, let’s take a look at some of these individuals with, “credentials”.

Dr. Mark Greer, Dental Chief, Hawaii Dept. of Health
Back in the year 2000, Dr. Greer, on Hawaii Public Radio, made the statement that fluoride is safe because there were toxicology tests done on it that verified this. Sounds great doesn’t it? There’s one problem though – only in 2006, by the National Research Council, were toxicology tests done on the fluoride substances that are added to the water supply with the conclusion that fluoride was indeed toxic and dangerous to health. Their finding? Anything more than 1.2 ppm is toxic! Also, after trying unsuccessfully twice to obtain a copy of Dr. Greer’s alleged report substantiating his toxicology assertion, I had to go through the Attorney General’s office to obtain the report under the Freedom of Information Act. It’s funny though that the several hundred page report that I received from Dr. Greer contained nothing about toxicology testing. I guess he thought I would never read such a long, boring report. But, when you know that a person is a liar, you leave nothing to chance.
So, the question that arises is, why would a man in Dr. Greer’s position deliberately lie? Does his brainwashed desire to fluoridate the water supply take precedence over his integrity? Apparently and unbelievably, so!

For the rest of his presentation go here.


The Hidden Agenda – The Fluoride Deception by Dr Stanley Monteith, MD.

About Clare Swinney

Committed to awakening those still asleep. Please keep an open mind and do your own research. WebofEvidence on YouTube: Clare on Bitchute:
This entry was posted in Natural health news and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Deception of Fluoridation

  1. Philip says:

    This is very good information, Clare, I will copy this article and use it to wake up folks who have no idea how dangerous fluoride is.

    I fought water fluoridation on the local level, so I’m familiar with the way the establishment peddles the poison while, at the same time, keeping local townspeople in the dark regarding just how toxic it really is.

    It’s surreal to watch officials knowingly allow (and in some cases promote) something that can so adversely affect the health of others in the community.

    But, of course, I’m sure you know, Clare, those promoters of fluoridation for other people; often have spring water delivered to their offices on a regular basis!

    They did this locally, after I presented evidence that water fluoridation is harmful. For some reason, they didn’t want to drink it themselves.

    “What other therapeutic prophylactic substance has ever been allowed to be administered to patients, unsupervised, with no control over consumption and no recommendation for dose? Fluoride is recognized as a cumulative toxic substance and there is considerable scientific evidence to show that a proportion of the population is liable to consume more fluoride than is advisable. This can lead, amongst other conditions, to osteoporosis.

    Since the concept of fluoridating public water supplies was introduced we have become exposed to many other sources, through fluoridated dentifrices, tablets, and dental treatments, which has exacerbated the problem. In addition, for any drug that has ever been produced, there is a minority of the population who, because of their genetic make up, are peculiarly susceptible to its toxic properties. Furthermore there are periods, such as fetal life, infancy and extreme old age, when the body’s ability to detoxify substances and excrete them are less than optimal. It appears that few considerations for such vulnerabilities in water fluoridation have been made”.

    I have serious concerns about the fluoride content of beverages in the supermarket, and even the health food stores.

    The majority of these drinks seem to come from “concentrate” which means water (from somewhere) is added. Does it contain fluoride? If so, how many ppm? The consumer has a right to know.

    What about the “calcium” that is being added to orange juice in the US? Is it a by-product of manufacturing something else? Does it contain fluoride? If so, how much?

    Are they using the “calcium” ploy to fluoridate people without their knowledge? Especially, using an orange juice that is “not from concentrate”? Most consumers would not expect a juice that is not from concentrate to contain fluoride.

    Companies should be required to state, on the label, how much fluoride their product contains. If fluoride was indeed beneficial, they would be “falling over themselves” to inform the consumer that their product contained a given amount.

    Of course, we all know why they do not want to place it right on the label and give the public a choice in the matter. No, can’t have that. It must be disguised in fruit juices that, otherwise, look like healthy choices. The fluoride content might be rather shocking, if consumers were to learn what is actually in some of these drinks.

    Thank you, Clare, for posting that excellent information. I am going to go to the link and read the rest of the presentation.

    Philip Dec – P.O. Box 76 – Monmouth, Maine – 04259 – USA

  2. Clare Swinney says:

    Bertrand Russell, the well bred elitist, whose views were highly respected by the very wealthy dominant minority wrote in ‘The Impact of Science on Society’ (1953): “Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.”

    He believed in reducing the fertility and IQ of the general public to ease “overpopulation” and produce more docile workers. In The Scientific Outlook (1931) he wrote: “by means of injections and drugs and CHEMICALS the population could be induced to bear whatever its scientific masters may decide to be for its good.”

    It is no coincidence that fluoride is put into tap water, when it is known to lower IQ and fertility rates, amongst other things.
    They gave Russell a Nobel Prize in Literature, which says a great deal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s